messe an hour ago Reminds me of exokernel architectures[0.5][1.5][2.5]. How is non-CPU resource multiplexing handled, or planned to be handled?[0.5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exokernel[1.5]: https://wiki.osdev.org/Exokernel[2.5]: "Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration." — Stan Kelly-Bootle
andutu 2 hours ago Pretty cool, sound similar to what Barrelfish OS enabled (https://barrelfish.org/).
zokier 2 hours ago Interestingly the author has a startup revolving around this technology. Their webpage has some info: https://multikernel.io/
rwmj 2 hours ago Sounds similar to CoLinux where you could run a "cooperative Linux" alongside Windows http://www.colinux.org/
vaastav 2 hours ago How is this different from/similar to Barrelfish? exe34 an hour ago mainline vs abandoned.
9cb14c1ec0 an hour ago It would be interesting to see a detailed security assessment of this. Would it provide security improvements over docker?
Reminds me of exokernel architectures[0.5][1.5][2.5]. How is non-CPU resource multiplexing handled, or planned to be handled?
[0.5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exokernel
[1.5]: https://wiki.osdev.org/Exokernel
[2.5]: "Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration." — Stan Kelly-Bootle
Pretty cool, sound similar to what Barrelfish OS enabled (https://barrelfish.org/).
would this allow running both linux and bsd kernels?
Interestingly the author has a startup revolving around this technology. Their webpage has some info: https://multikernel.io/
Sounds similar to CoLinux where you could run a "cooperative Linux" alongside Windows http://www.colinux.org/
How is this different from/similar to Barrelfish?
mainline vs abandoned.
Does this mean resiliency against kernel panics?
It would be interesting to see a detailed security assessment of this. Would it provide security improvements over docker?